A landmark national security trial in Hong Kong has entered its final phase, with judges now deliberating their verdict in the case against prominent businessman Jimmy Lai. The 77-year-old media founder faces charges that could result in a life sentence if convicted.
The trial, which concluded arguments on Thursday, represents one of the most significant legal proceedings under Hong Kong’s national security framework. Lai has been detained since 2020 on allegations of conspiring with foreign entities and publishing seditious materials through his former media organization.
During the extended proceedings, which spanned 156 days, prosecutors contended that Lai utilized his media platform and international connections to encourage foreign governments to impose sanctions against Chinese and Hong Kong authorities. They characterized his actions as demonstrating “unwavering intent” in a sustained campaign against government interests.
Lai’s legal team challenged the prosecution’s evidence, arguing that the case lacked sufficient proof of conspiracy with named individuals after the implementation of the national security law. Defense counsel maintained that supporting freedom of expression and human rights through media work does not constitute criminal activity.
The courtroom proceedings drew international attention, with observers frequently lining up for hours to secure limited seating. Lai appeared in court wearing a beige linen blazer and white shirt, occasionally offering gestures of acknowledgment to supporters in the public gallery before being escorted away by corrections officers.
The case has unfolded against the backdrop of significant legal changes in Hong Kong, including the departure from jury trials in national security cases. The proceedings experienced multiple delays due to weather conditions and concerns about the defendant’s health.
As the judicial panel considers its decision, the outcome is anticipated to have substantial implications for Hong Kong’s legal landscape and its approach to national security enforcement. No timeline has been provided for when the verdict will be announced.
