The political leadership of Hamas is expected to conditionally accept a new ceasefire proposal for Gaza, though significant amendments will be demanded before final approval, according to regional analysts and sources familiar with the group’s position.
The proposal, presented by the United States, sets a tight timeline for response and outlines a pathway to end the prolonged conflict. While the Israeli government has already endorsed the framework, Hamas officials are engaged in intense internal discussions across their various bases of operation.
A central point of contention is the stipulation requiring the militant group to disarm. Sources indicate this is a major obstacle, viewed as untenable without concurrent political guarantees, particularly those related to Palestinian statehood. The group’s military wing is reportedly especially resistant to this condition.
“The choice before them is stark,” commented one political analyst. “Outright rejection risks severe consequences, while unconditional acceptance is politically impossible. They will likely signal agreement in principle while negotiating key changes.”
External pressure is being applied on Hamas by regional mediators to show flexibility and make concessions. This external influence, however, must be balanced against the need to maintain unity within the movement, where differing perspectives exist between political negotiators abroad and commanders on the ground.
Despite suffering substantial military losses, including the deaths of numerous senior commanders, the group maintains operational capabilities and a degree of administrative control in parts of Gaza. This resilience informs its negotiating stance.
Some factions within the organization advocate for continued resistance, believing that time and sustained guerrilla pressure could ultimately work to their advantage. This internal dynamic complicates the formation of a unified response.
The proposed agreement includes provisions for the release of all remaining captives, a phased Israeli military withdrawal to designated zones, a major influx of humanitarian assistance, and a reciprocal release of Palestinian prisoners. The assurance that Gaza will not be re-occupied by Israel is seen as a positive element.
A final decision from Hamas is anticipated within days as the diplomatic deadline approaches.
