A royal commentator has suggested that the friction which led Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, to step back from royal duties was exacerbated by what is described as a “drama addiction,” resulting in what are characterized as largely avoidable consequences.
The author’s analysis, drawn from a recent biography, posits a key difference in the experiences of other high-profile entrants into the monarchy. It is noted that when King Charles married Camilla, the Queen Consort, he actively guided her through the intricacies of palace life, helping her manage public perception. In contrast, the author contends that Prince Harry did not undertake a similar role for his wife. The argument is made that their shared dynamic was built on a mutual opposition to established norms, positioning Meghan as an ally in a broader struggle.
This approach, according to the biographer, cultivated a pattern of conflict that culminated in the couple’s decision to relocate to the United States in 2020. The situation has drawn commentary on perceived disparities within the institution. A friend of the Duchess recently voiced strong criticism regarding what were termed “ridiculous double standards,” contrasting the treatment of Meghan with that of Prince Andrew.
The friend expressed frustration that significant efforts were seemingly made to shield Prince Andrew from controversy for years, while the Duchess was reportedly labeled as “difficult” for what are described as minor inquiries. This comparison is used to underscore a defense of the couple’s choice to seek independence from the constraints of their former roles.
